The Complex Causes of Land Clearing in Australia
There's broad agreement on the main culprits behind land clearing: agricultural expansion to grow more crops and raise livestock, infrastructure projects like building roads and installing utilities, logging for wood products, and urban development as cities and towns sprawl.
How Agriculture Drove Land Clearing in Australia
Australia's cleared land has mostly been used for the production of wheat, cattle, and sheep. Cattle graze on marginal semi-deserts with native vegetation across 46.3% of Australia. Other than kangaroo culling, this land is too dry and infertile for any other kind of agriculture. This grazing land has had some of its "woody scrub" removed. Currently, 15% of Australia's land is used for forestry and other agricultural uses, primarily on cleared areas. Because the land in New South Wales is so productive, a large portion of the remaining forests and woodlands have been cleared. While not a primary cause, urban development is also a contributing factor in some land clearing. For instance, a large portion of urban development in the Australian Capital Territory has been built on agricultural land that had previously been cleared.
Australia's Burning Nightmare: The Threat of Bushfires
Australia experiences frequent bushfires during the hot summer months.
Land Clearing's Impact on Habitat, Species, and Soil
Clearing land eliminates local ecosystems, plants, and the food and habitat that other native species depend on. Clearing can result in soil degradation, such as erosion and salinity, which can impact water quality. It also promotes the growth of weeds and invasive animals and has an impact on greenhouse gas emissions.
The Ripple Effect of Logging on Land Health
Land clearing puts a lot of strain on the state of the land since the land cover is so important. Additionally, removing vegetation exposes the soil to erosion. Maintaining stable soil is crucial to preventing land degradation.
Soil Erosion's Grip on Land Productivity and Biodiversity
Because it damages existing vegetation and habitats and prevents vegetation and other biotas that live in the vegetation from re-establishing, soil erosion puts a great deal of pressure on the state of the land. This creates a "negative" feedback loop. Soils can be replenished with nutrients by terrestrial vegetation. There will be less biological matter available to decompose and replenish the nutrients in the soil if the vegetation is removed. Further depletion of nutrients occurs when soil is exposed to erosion. The water quality surrounding the Great Barrier Reef has also been impacted by soil erosion from deforested land.
Shifting Attitudes and the Fight Against Land Clearing
Laws pertaining to land clearing have long been political footballs. Environmentalists and labor unions have opposed the clearing of beaches, forests, and other particular locations since the 1970s. The rate of land clearing has decreased since the 1980s as a result of shifting perceptions and increased knowledge of the detrimental effects of the clearing. In the 1990s and the first part of the 2000s, the governments of Queensland and New South Wales banned land clearing. Being the only developed country to continue deforestation, Australia continues to do so.
Every year, as part of the Statewide Landcover and Trees Study, satellite imagery is used by both Queensland and New South Wales to monitor land clearing.
State Regulation Takes Center Stage: Controlling Land Clearing in Australia
Land clearing in Australia is primarily controlled by legislation at the state level. This includes Western Australia, South Australia, Victoria, New South Wales, and, to a lesser extent, Queensland. However, the specific regulations and approaches vary significantly between these jurisdictions. While growing awareness of land degradation has spurred action, farmers often oppose stricter clearing controls.
Federal Law: A Safety Net for Endangered Species and Ecosystems
Although not the primary driver, federal law also plays a role in regulating land clearing. The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act of 1999 (Cth) can come into effect if the land in question harbors federally protected threatened species (plants or animals) or endangered ecological communities. This act serves as a safety net for these critical environmental components.
Fire Safety Through Controlled Clearing: The 10/30 or 10/50 Rule
In some Australian states, fire risk plays a significant role in land clearing regulations. Depending on the proximity to high-risk bushfire zones, rules like the 10/30 rule or the 10/50 rule may be implemented. These allow for the clearing of trees within a specific distance (10 meters) of homes or the removal of undergrowth within a larger radius (30 or 50 meters). This approach aims to reduce potential fuel sources for wildfires near houses, thereby increasing fire safety and protecting lives and property.
Conclusion
Moving forward, Australia needs a multi-faceted approach. Sustainable land management practices that minimize clearing and prioritize conservation are crucial. Continued research and investment in agricultural innovation can help farmers achieve productivity goals without sacrificing the environment. Additionally, public education and collaboration among stakeholders - government, farmers, environmental groups, and citizens - are essential to finding common ground and creating a sustainable future for Australia's land. To ensure a sustainable future for Australia's forests, the government must strengthen the Regional Forest Agreements (RFAs) to address the ongoing threats of woodchipping and ensure comprehensive protection and management.
Tweets
New documents from WA Water Corporation reveal that Alcoa's deforestation and forest mining are set to cause permanent and irreversible damage to the globally significant Northern Jarrah Forests and pose a serious threat to Perth's water supply. pic.twitter.com/k1PSEeNiwr
— Wilderness Society (@Wilderness_Aus) June 27, 2024
Pictures
